We check each bill’s text for five signs of corruption risk. Every score quotes the official text.
Search a federal bill by number, or by title for bills already checked. A number is from the current Congress; add the Congress for an older bill, such as 117 H.R. 2. The result appears in a minute or two and is saved for everyone.
12bills with signs of risk24bills checked so far
Strongest signs first. Open a bill to read every quote and the reasons the risk may be smaller.
119th Congress · Latest action 2026-06-18
33/100
Clear signsWhy this score: The operative amendment narrows beneficial-ownership disclosure and separately requires deletion of already collected records. Those provisions support disclosure-exemption and oversight-loss concerns, with a modest broad-class benefit score. Existing FinCEN exemptions materially limit the incremental reporting effect; this is not a finding of corruption or that any named company sought concealment.
119th Congress · Latest action 2025-05-06
23/100
Minor signsWhy this score: Express repeal of the identified loan-data collection and reporting provision supports a disclosure-loss score and a modest broad-class lender-benefit score. The stated compliance-cost and credit-access rationale is counterevidence. The same data repeal is not counted again as a separate oversight-removal mechanism, and no discrimination or corrupt intent is inferred.
23/100
Minor signsWhy this score: The bill expressly repeals the CFPB's founding statutory framework without specifying a replacement oversight structure. That supports an oversight-removal concern and a small broad-class private-benefit score. Restoring predecessor laws is significant counterevidence: this review does not claim all financial regulation or consumer remedies would vanish.
22/100
Minor signsWhy this score: The review, publication and petition provisions add accountability, but the automatic nonapplication and expiration provisions can remove substantive regulatory protections because an agency misses procedural duties. Those support bounded private-benefit and oversight-loss concerns. Publication, judicial review and a reinstatement process are substantial safeguards; no corrupt motive or realized harm is established.
119th Congress · Latest action 2025-07-17
15/100
Minor signsWhy this score: The reviewed House-passed version creates a broad private-provider advantage and excludes a public retail CBDC option. These support a limited structural competition-risk score, not a finding of corruption. No supported opaque-allocation, oversight-removal or disclosure-exemption mechanism was identified.
119th Congress · Latest action 2025-09-18
10/100
Minor signsWhy this score: The bill creates broad statutory bans on fossil fuel development, exports, and emissions rather than creating targeted spending or private carve-outs. Low structural risk is present through discretionary executive exceptions for crude oil exports and incumbent protections via grandfathering and technology definitions, but there are no oversight rollbacks or transparency exemptions. This analysis evaluates structural design and is not a finding of corruption.
119th Congress · Latest action 2025-04-10
8/100
Minor signsWhy this score: The express restriction on district-court injunctive relief supports a bounded judicial-oversight concern because nonparties may receive less immediate protection from challenged action. The represented-party exception, multi-state three-judge procedure and appeals materially limit the concern. No private economic beneficiary, disclosure exemption or corrupt motive is established.
5/100
Minor signsWhy this score: The operative reported amendment principally restricts officials' investments and improves disclosure. Extending the divestiture tax-deferral mechanism to covered officials is a small, explicit class benefit, scored separately from the anti-conflict restrictions and their limitations. The deferral facilitates compliance and does not establish tax forgiveness, improper motive or personal profiteering.
