
H.R. 1205 · 100th Congress · enacted
A bill to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to release a reversionary interest of the United States in certain land located in Putnam County, Florida, and to direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain mineral interests of the United States in such land to the State of Florida.
Became Public Law No: 100-133.
Latest official action 1987-10-16 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to release a reversionary interest of the United States in specified land in Putnam County, Florida, in exchange for the State of Florida agreeing to a similar restriction on other specified lands. Directs the Secretary of the Interior to convey U.S. mineral rights in the original, restricted lands. Requires the State of Florida to pay fair market value and administrative costs for the conveyance of such mineral interests.
Congressional Research Service · 1987-02-24
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
0 of 0 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.