Recently enacted laws

H.R. 1947 · 100th Congress · enacted

Magistrates' Retirement Parity Act of 1987

Became Public Law No: 100-53.

Latest official action 1987-06-18 · Enacted

The bill, briefly

Magistrates' Retirement Parity Act of 1987 - Amends provisions of Federal law relating to civil service retirement to make the retirement of U.S. magistrates comparable to that of bankruptcy judges. Makes magistrates and bankruptcy judges eligible for immediate retirement after becoming age 62 and completing five years of civilian service, or after becoming 60 years of age and completing ten years of service as a bankruptcy judge or magistrate. Provides methods for computing the annuity of U.S. magistrates.

Congressional Research Service · 1987-04-06

Who reported lobbying on this bill?

Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed

The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.

No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.

2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.

Politicians behind the bill

Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.

No current-officeholder sponsorship match is available. Historical sponsors may have left office.

0 of 0 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.

PAC donors to the listed sponsors

These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.

The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.

What happened after enactment?

Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.

Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.