H.R. 3226 · 100th Congress · enacted
A bill to amend the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 to permit certain participants in the White House Conference for a Drug Free America to be allowed travel expenses, and for other purposes.
Became Public Law No: 100-138.
Latest official action 1987-10-23 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Amends the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 to authorize travel expenses for participants in the White House Conference for a Drug Free America for whom it would be economically burdensome or otherwise impracticable to participate in such Conference. Authorizes the Conference to accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations to carry out its responsibilities. Limits such gifts or donations to: (1) food, food services, transportation, or lodging and related services; or (2) funds for such services.
Congressional Research Service · 1987-08-07
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
0 of 0 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.