Recently enacted laws

H.R. 1472 · 101st Congress · enacted

To establish the Grand Island National Recreation Area in the State of Michigan, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 101-292.

Latest official action 1990-05-17 · Enacted

The bill, briefly

Establishes the Grand Island National Recreation Area, Michigan, to provide for the conservation of the natural resources of such area. Requires the Secretary of Agriculture to develop a management plan. Directs the Secretary to establish the Grand Island Advisory Commission to provide advice to the Secretary with respect to the preparation of such management plan. Requires the Commission to recommend proposals for non-Federal development on Grand Island. Authorizes appropriations.

Congressional Research Service · 1990-03-20

Who reported lobbying on this bill?

Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed

The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.

No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.

2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.

Politicians behind the bill

Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.

No current-officeholder sponsorship match is available. Historical sponsors may have left office.

14 of 14 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.

PAC donors to the listed sponsors

These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.

The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.

What happened after enactment?

Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.

Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.