H.R. 310 · 101st Congress · enacted
To remove a restriction from a parcel of land in Roanoke, Virginia, in order for that land to be conveyed to the State of Virginia for use as a veterans nursing home.
Became Public Law No: 101-68.
Latest official action 1989-08-01 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Directs the Secretary of the Interior to remove the restriction that a certain parcel of land in Roanoke, Virginia, be used exclusively for public park or public recreation purposes, on the condition that such land be transferred to the State of Virginia for use as a veterans' nursing home. Prohibits the Secretary from removing such restriction if within four years the State of Virginia has not committed funds for such veterans' nursing home. Provides that such parcel of land shall revert to the United States if, after the removal of such restriction, such parcel of land ceases to be used for purposes of a veterans' nursing home.
Congressional Research Service · 1989-01-03
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
9 of 9 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.