S. 3215 · 101st Congress · enacted
A bill to authorize the transfer by lease of a specified naval landing ship dock to the Government of Brazil.
Became Public Law No: 101-568.
Latest official action 1990-11-15 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Authorizes the Secretary of the Navy to lease the naval landing ship dock Alamo to the Governmment of Brazil under leasing authority provided in the Arms Export Control Act. Requires lease costs to be charged to the Government of Brazil. Terminates such leasing authority if such lease is not entered into within two years after enactment of this Act. Bars the Secretary from exercising the authority granted under this Act unless and until the Brazilian Government has provided written assurances to the Secretary of State that Brazil is in compliance with the United Nations sanctions against Iraq and has discontinued the export to Iraq of all military equipment, materials, and technologies.
Congressional Research Service · 1990-10-18
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
1 of 1 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.