
S. 737 · 101st Congress · enacted
A bill to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain lands adjacent to the boundary of Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of Colorado.
Became Public Law No: 101-192.
Latest official action 1989-11-29 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain lands as additions to the Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Directs the Secretary of Agriculture, upon acquisition of such lands by the Secretary of the Interior, to revise the boundary of the Roosevelt National Forest to exclude such lands from the national forest boundary. Prohibits the Secretary from acquiring specified lands in the County of Boulder, Colorado, except with the consent of the owner, unless such property is developed in a manner which would change its use as a single family residence.
Congressional Research Service · 1989-09-15
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
1 of 1 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.