Recently enacted laws

S.J.Res. 206 · 101st Congress · enacted

A joint resolution calling for the United States to encourage immediate negotiations toward a new agreement among Antarctic Treaty Consultative parties, for the full protection of Antarctica as a global ecological commons.

Became Public Law No: 101-620.

Latest official action 1990-11-16 · Enacted

The bill, briefly

Declares that: (1) Antarctica is a global ecological commons and should be subject to new agreements or protocols which supplement the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 providing for comprehensive environmental protection of Antarctica and which should for an indefinite period establish Antarctica as a region closed to commercial minerals development and related activities; (2) under such new agreements, information about minerals or other resources in Antarctica should be obtained under strictly controlled arrangements and should be openly shared in the international scientific community; (3) the Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities does not guarantee protection of the environment of Antarctica and could stimulate commercial exploitation; (4) pending the negotiations and entry into force of a new agreement or protocol ensuring the full protection of Antarctica as a global ecological commons, the Convention should not be presented to the the Senate for advice and consent to ratification; (5) until such new agreements enter into force, the United States should support the interim restraint measures presently in force among the Consultative Parties to the Treaty; and (6) the negotiation of such new agreements or protocols should be supported by the United States at the November 1990 meeting of the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties in Santiago, Chile.

Congressional Research Service · 1990-10-04

Who reported lobbying on this bill?

Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed

The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.

No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.

2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.

Politicians behind the bill

Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.

No current-officeholder sponsorship match is available. Historical sponsors may have left office.

24 of 24 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.

PAC donors to the listed sponsors

These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.

The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.

What happened after enactment?

Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.

Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.