
H.R. 3259 · 102nd Congress · enacted
To authorize appropriations for drug abuse education and prevention programs relating to youth gangs and to runaway and homeless youth; and for other purposes.
Became Public Law No: 102-132.
Latest official action 1991-10-18 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Amends the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to extend through FY 1994 the authorization of appropriations for specified programs for drug abuse education and prevention: (1) relating to youth gangs; and (2) for runaway and homeless youth. Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to report annually to specified congressional officials on the program of drug education and prevention relating to youth gangs. Includes, as eligible grant and contract recipients under such program, consortia of local education, juvenile justice, employment, and social service agencies.
Congressional Research Service · 1991-09-30
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
0 of 0 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.