
H.R. 2144 · 103rd Congress · enacted
Guam Excess Lands Act
Became Public Law No: 103-339.
Latest official action 1994-10-06 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Guam Excess Lands Act - Directs the Administrator of General Services to transfer specified excess Federal lands to Guam for public benefit, by quitclaim deed and without reimbursement. Makes such lands eligible for transfer upon the enactment and submission to specified congressional committees by Guam of a land use plan. Declares that such property shall not be subject to the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act or the requirement set forth in the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1981 that the sale by the Government of Guam of certain property, including property within the Apra Harbor complex, conveyed to it by the Secretary of the Navy shall only be for monetary consideration.
Congressional Research Service · 1993-05-18
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
6 of 6 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.