Recently enacted laws

H.R. 2017 · 104th Congress · enacted

District of Columbia Emergency Highway Relief Act

Became Public Law No: 104-21.

Latest official action 1995-08-04 · Enacted

The bill, briefly

District of Columbia Emergency Highway Relief Act - Requires the Federal share of the costs of certain highway projects within the District of Columbia during FY 1995 and 1996 to be up to 100 percent, as requested by the District. Includes as eligible a project for a route proposed for inclusion in the National Highway System or of regional significance for which the United States is or , before September 30, 1996, becomes obligated to pay the Federal share and with respect to which the Mayor of the District certifies that sufficient funds are not available to pay the full non-Federal share of costs.Requires the District, by July 31, 1997, to repay the amount of any increased Federal share paid for a project by the United States or such amount will be deducted from the funds apportioned or allocated to the District for the category of the project for FY 1997.

Congressional Research Service · 1995-07-12

Who reported lobbying on this bill?

Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed

The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.

No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.

2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.

Politicians behind the bill

Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.

6 of 6 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.

PAC donors to the listed sponsors

These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE$2,500
TRANSPORTATION INTERMEDIARIES ASSOCIATION'S TIAPAC$2,500
TRUCKING POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS INC.$2,500
TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEE$1,500
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,000
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (UAPAC)$1,000
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (VERIZON PAC)$1,000

The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.

What happened after enactment?

Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.

Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.