H.R. 1460 · 105th Congress · enacted
To allow for election of the Delegate from Guam by other than separate ballot, and for other purposes.
Became Public Law No: 105-209.
Latest official action 1998-07-29 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Amends Federal law to revise the requirements relating to the election of the Delegate from Guam to require the Delegate to be elected at large and by a majority of the votes cast for the office of Delegate. Amends the Compact of Free Association Act of 1985 to extend, for five years, the USDA agricultural and food programs for the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Directs the President to ensure that assistance provided under these programs reflects changes in the population since the inception of such programs.
Congressional Research Service · 1997-09-23
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
No current-officeholder sponsorship match is available. Historical sponsors may have left office.
0 of 0 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.
Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.