H.R. 2389 · 106th Congress · enacted
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000
Became Public Law No: 106-393.
Latest official action 2000-10-30 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 1999 - Title I: Secure Payments for States and Counties Containing Federal Lands - Directs the Secretary of the Treasury, with respect to timber-related and other revenue sharing payments from Bureau of Land Management and National Forest System lands (including certain California and Oregon lands), to calculate the full payment amount for eligible States and counties by averaging the three highest annual 25 percent payments or 50 percent payments, respectively, during the FY 1984 through 1999 eligibility period. Provides for annual adjustments. (Sec. 102) Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to make payments to eligible States from Forest Service lands for affected counties to use for public education and transportation through FY 2006. Sets forth State distribution and county expenditure provisions, including a special provision for counties receiving less than $100,000 in FY 2000. (Sec. 103) Directs the Secretary to make payments to eligible counties from Bureau of Land Management lands for public safety, law enforcement, education, and other public purposes through FY 2006. Sets forth payment and expenditure provisions. Title II: Locally Initiated Projects on Federal Lands - States that project funds shall be expended solely for projects meeting the requirements of this title that are conducted on Federal lands. …
Congressional Research Service · 1999-11-03
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
Cosponsor
Mike Thompson
House · CA District 4 · Democratic
$1,885,724PAC receipts · 2025–2026
Cosponsor
Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.
House · GA District 2 · Democratic
$792,250PAC receipts · 2025–2026
36 of 36 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION$20,000
BLUE DOG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE$20,000
NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E$17,500
COX ENTERPRISES PAC (COXPAC) INC.$17,500
NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$17,500
NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA COMMITTEE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COTTON$17,000
ALTRIA GROUP, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ALTRIAPAC)$16,500
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION AMERICA'S ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES PAC$16,500
AFLAC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AFLAC PAC)$15,000
AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC$15,000
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC)$15,000
AMERICAN PISTACHIO GROWERS PISTACHIO POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15,000
ERNST & YOUNG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15,000
MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS$15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS OF U.S.A. POLITICAL FUND (LETTER CARRIER POLITICAL FUND)$15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15,000
NATIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COUNCIL AND REAL ESTATE TECHNOLOGY AND TRANSFORMATION CENTER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NMHC PAC)$15,000
THE FARM CREDIT COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15,000
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA - COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEE$13,000
WALMART INC. PAC FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT$13,000
EMPLOYEES OF RTX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$12,500
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC$12,500
THE HOME DEPOT INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$12,500
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$12,200
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$12,000
D.R.I.V.E. - DEM, REP, IND VOTER ED (THE PAC OF THE INT'L BRHD OF TEAMSTERS)$11,500
HOLLAND & KNIGHT COMMITTEE FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT$11,500
WITH HONOR PAC$11,500
BUILD POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS (BUILDPAC)$11,000
MOTORSPORTS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (SPEED PAC)$11,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF FOREST OWNERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NAFO PAC)$11,000
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$11,000
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC$10,000
ALABAMA PEANUT PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, PEANUTPAC OF ALABAMA$10,000
Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordAMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY BRAINPAC$10,000
Mike Thompson · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordAMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY PAC (HEARTPAC)$10,000
Mike Thompson · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC$10,000
Mike Thompson · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordThe largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.
Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.