S. 507 · 106th Congress · enacted
Water Resources Development Act of 1999
Became Public Law No: 106-53.
Latest official action 1999-08-17 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Water Resources Projects Title II: General Provisions Title III: Project-Related Provisions Title IV: Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Water Resources Development Act of 1999 - Title I: Water Resources Projects - Authorizes projects for navigation, environmental restoration, flood damage reduction, recreation, flood control, storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration and shore protection, and aquifer storage and recovery in Alaska, Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland and Virginia, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Dakota, and Texas. Authorizes projects for water resources development and conservation and related purposes, subject to a final report from the Army Chief of Engineers and approval by the Secretary of the Army, in Alaska, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington, Tennessee, and Washington. (Sec. 102) Modifies projects for flood control, navigation, water conveyance, water supply storage reallocation, water diversion, beach erosion control and hurricane protection, land retention, storm damage reduction and shoreline protection, environmental infrastructure, and hurricane-flood protection (together with certain report requirements or land transfers, in some cases) in Arkansa…
Congressional Research Service · 1999-04-19
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
No current-officeholder sponsorship match is available. Historical sponsors may have left office.
6 of 6 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.
Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.