Recently enacted laws

H.R. 3340 · 107th Congress · enacted

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow certain catch-up contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan to be made by participants age 50 or over.

Became Public Law No: 107-304.

Latest official action 2002-11-27 · Enacted

The bill, briefly

Allows certain eligible participants in the Civil Service Retirement System and the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) to make such additional contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan as are permitted by: (1) provisions of the Internal Revenue Code pertaining to catch-up contributions to pension, profit-sharing, and/or stock bonus plans for individuals age 50 and over; and (2) consistent with regulations of the Executive Director of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. Applies such provisions with respect to justices and judges of the United States, bankruptcy and magistrate judges, Court of Federal Claims judges, judges of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, and members of the uniformed services who are enrolled in FERS.

Congressional Research Service · 2002-09-25

Who reported lobbying on this bill?

Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed

The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.

No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.

2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.

Politicians behind the bill

Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.

12 of 12 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.

PAC donors to the listed sponsors

These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.

CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS$5,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $5,000

Official PAC record
MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS$5,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $5,000

Official PAC record
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E$2,500

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $2,500

Official PAC record
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2,500

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $2,500

Official PAC record
TEXTILE RENTAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (TRSAPAC)$2,500

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $2,500

Official PAC record
REVIVING AMERICAN JOBS AGAIN PAC DBA EQUAL OPPORTUNITY NOW$2,001

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $2,001

Official PAC record
ILLINOIS POLITICAL ACTIVE LETTER CARRIERS$2,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $2,000

Official PAC record
WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS OF AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $2,000

Official PAC record
ILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT FUND-FEDERAL$1,500

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $1,500

Official PAC record
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $1,000

Official PAC record
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · $1,000

Official PAC record
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$0
NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATION$0
GE HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES INC. PAC-$1,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · -$1,000

Official PAC record
VICTORY IN NOVEMBER ELECTION PAC-$1,000

Danny K. Davis · Cosponsor · -$1,000

Official PAC record

The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.

What happened after enactment?

Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.

Measured outcome: not established

Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.