Recently enacted laws

S. 3044 · 107th Congress · enacted

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Interstate Supervision Act of 2002

Became Public Law No: 107-302.

Latest official action 2002-11-26 · Enacted

The bill, briefly

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Interstate Supervision Act of 2002 - Amends the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 to require the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia to arrange for the supervision of: (1) District of Columbia (DC) offenders on parole (current law), probation, and supervised release who seek to reside in jurisdictions outside DC; and (2) offenders on parole, probation, and supervised release from jurisdictions outside DC who seek to reside in DC. Authorizes the Director to enter into offender supervision agreements, including the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision, with any State or group of States.

Congressional Research Service · 2002-10-03

Who reported lobbying on this bill?

Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed

The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.

No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.

2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.

Politicians behind the bill

Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.

1 of 1 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.

PAC donors to the listed sponsors

These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.

NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATION$2,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,200
DAVITA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (DAPAC)$1,000
GE HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES INC. PAC$1,000
FASPAC FAREWAY STORES INC PAC$0
CUMMINS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CIPAC)-$1,000
GOOGLE LLC NETPAC-$1,000
THE TIMKEN COMPANY GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND-$1,000
THE OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION PAC-$2,000
COVINGTON AND BURLING LLP PAC-$2,500
NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION RETAILPAC-$2,500
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ARAPAC)-$5,000
ARGENTUM'S SILVER PAC-$5,000
GRIDIRON-PAC-$5,000
HY-VEE INC EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE-$5,000

The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.

What happened after enactment?

Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.

Measured outcome: not established

Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.