S. 523 · 108th Congress · enacted
Native American Technical Corrections Act of 2004
Became Public Law No: 108-204.
Latest official action 2004-03-02 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
Native American Technical Corrections Act of 2003 - Makes technical amendments to the Bosque Redondo Memorial Act, the Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Act, and other specified Federal law with regard to: (1) the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe (oil shale reserve); (2) the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians; (3) the Pueblo de Cochiti (modification of settlement); (4) the Chippewa Cree Tribe (modification of settlement); (5) the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians; (6) the Barona Band of Mission Indians (facilitation of construction of pipeline to provide water for emergency fire suppression and other purposes); (7) the conveyance of Native Alaskan objects; (8) the Oglala Sioux Tribe (waiver of repayment of expert assistance loans); (9) the Pueblo of Acoma (land and mineral consolidation); (10) the Pueblo of Santo Domingo (waiver of repayment of expert assistance loans); (11) the Quinault Indian Nation (water feasibility study); (12) the Santee Sioux Tribe (study and report); (13) the Seminole Tribe of Oklahoma (waiver of repayment of expert assistance loans); (14) the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community; (15) the trust for the Pueblo of Santa Clara, New Mexico; (16) the trust for the Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico; (17) survey and legal descriptions; (18) administration of trust land; and (19) distribution of judgment funds. Specifies the required distribution and use of funds appropriat…
Congressional Research Service · 2003-03-05
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
No current-officeholder sponsorship match is available. Historical sponsors may have left office.
1 of 1 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.
Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.