H.R. 1369 · 112th Congress · enacted
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1021 Pennsylvania Avenue in Hartshorne, Oklahoma, as the "Warren Lindley Post Office".
Became Public Law No: 112-156.
Latest official action 2012-08-10 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1021 Pennsylvania Avenue in Hartshorne, Oklahoma, as the "Warren Lindley Post Office."
Congressional Research Service · 2012-08-10
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
Cosponsor
Tom Cole
House · OK District 4 · Republican
$1,647,752PAC receipts · 2025–2026
Cosponsor
James Lankford
Senate · OK · Republican
$375,000PAC receipts · 2025–2026
Cosponsor
Frank D. Lucas
House · OK District 3 · Republican
$722,374PAC receipts · 2025–2026
4 of 4 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
CROP INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION PAC-CIPA PAC$20,000
ERNST & YOUNG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NCBA-PAC)$20,000
NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA COMMITTEE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COTTON$20,000
SEABOARD CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$20,000
THE BOEING COMPANY PAC$20,000
THE FARM CREDIT COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$19,000
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $7,500
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $1,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordPHILLIPS 66 PAC$17,500
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $5,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $2,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordPLAINS COTTON GROWERS INC. PAC$17,500
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION AMERICA'S ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES PAC$15,500
AAR CORP. PAC$15,000
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $10,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $2,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $2,500
Official PAC recordAMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC$15,000
AMERICAN BAKERS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN BAKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15,000
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC)$15,000
EMPLOYEES OF NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION PAC$15,000
IN THE ARENA PAC$15,000
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $5,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $5,000
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15,000
NATIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COUNCIL AND REAL ESTATE TECHNOLOGY AND TRANSFORMATION CENTER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NMHC PAC)$15,000
TEXAS FARM BUREAU AGFUND$15,000
THE AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT$15,000
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND (GOODYEAR GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND)$15,000
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $10,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $2,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $2,500
Official PAC recordTHE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$15,000
USA RICE FEDERATION PAC$15,000
PARSONS CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$14,500
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION VOLUNTARY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$14,500
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $3,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $1,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordAMERICAN SENIORS HOUSING ASSOCIATION (SENIORS HOUSING PAC)$14,000
EMPLOYEES OF RTX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$14,000
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $10,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $3,000
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $1,000
Official PAC recordFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA PAC$14,000
FMR LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE - FEDERAL (FIDELITY PAC)$14,000
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$13,500
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $10,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $1,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $2,000
Official PAC recordNATIONAL APARTMENT ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$13,500
THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$13,500
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $2,500
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $2,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $8,500
Official PAC recordCME GROUP INC. PAC$12,500
DELOITTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$12,500
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $7,500
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $2,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $2,500
Official PAC recordDEVON ENERGY CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (DEC PAC)$12,500
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $5,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $2,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYER ORGANIZATIONS (NAPEO PAC)$12,500
ONE GAS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$12,500
Tom Cole · Cosponsor · $10,000
James Lankford · Cosponsor · $1,500
Frank D. Lucas · Cosponsor · $1,000
Official PAC recordThe largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.
Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.