S. 278 · 112th Congress · enacted
Sugar Loaf Fire Protection District Land Exchange Act of 2011
Became Public Law No: 112-79.
Latest official action 2011-12-23 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on December 16, 2011. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Sugar Loaf Fire Protection District Land Exchange Act of 2011 - Requires the Secretary of Agriculture (USDA), if the Sugar Loaf Fire Protection District of Boulder, Colorado, offers to convey non-federal land in unincorporated Boulder County and the offer is acceptable to the Secretary, to accept the offer and to convey federal land in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forests in Colorado. Applies provisions of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 relating to the exchange of public lands and interests within the National Forest System to the land exchange authorized under this Act, except that: (1) the Secretary may accept a cash equalization payment in excess of 25% of the value of the federal land, and (2) the District shall pay costs relating to any land surveys and appraisals of the federal and non-federal lands and enter into an agreement that allocates any other administrative costs between the Secretary and the District. Expresses the intent of Congress that such land exchange be completed within one year of enactment of this Act. Authorizes the Secretary to offer to sell the federal land to the District if the exchange is not completed by such deadline. Permits the Secretary to offer to sell such land to the District for its…
Congressional Research Service · 2011-12-23
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
1 of 1 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PRACTICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION PAC (EDPMA-PAC)$10,000
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordDAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE; AKA DFA-PAC$5,000
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordINVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ICI PAC)$5,000
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordNATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NCBA-PAC)$2,500
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $2,500
Official PAC recordSHEET METAL & AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS' NATIONAL ASSOC., INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2,500
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $2,500
Official PAC recordWESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE PAC$2,000
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $2,000
Official PAC recordAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY PAC (''ASTRO-PAC'')$1,500
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $1,500
Official PAC recordAMERICAN SPORTFISHING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,000
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $1,000
Official PAC recordBUTLER SNOW POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,000
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $1,000
Official PAC recordJSTREETPAC$500
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $500
Official PAC recordREGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$0
Michael F. Bennet · Cosponsor · $0
Official PAC recordThe largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.
Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.