Recently enacted laws

S. 3331 · 112th Congress · enacted

Intercountry Adoption Universal Accreditation Act of 2012

Became Public Law No: 112-276.

Latest official action 2013-01-14 · Enacted

The bill, briefly

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on December 5, 2012. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Intercountry Adoption Universal Accreditation Act of 2012 - Applies universal intercountry adoption accreditation standards under the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000, and related regulations, to the same extent as they apply to the offering or provision of adoption services in connection with an adoption under the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, to any person offering or providing adoption services in connection with a foreign orphan under age 16 adopted or to be adopted by a U.S. citizen. Gives the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS), the Attorney General, and the accrediting entities the duties, responsibilities, and authorities under the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000 and related regulations with respect to a person offering or providing such adoption services, regardless of whether such services are offered or provided in connection with a Convention adoption. Amends the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000 to: (1) repeal the prohibition against, and so make available, collected fees to accrediting entities; and (2) add a congressional report requirement on the use of federal funding.

Congressional Research Service · 2013-01-14

Who reported lobbying on this bill?

Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed

The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.

No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.

2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.

Politicians behind the bill

Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.

4 of 4 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.

PAC donors to the listed sponsors

These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.

NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATION$2,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,200
DAVITA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (DAPAC)$1,000
GE HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES INC. PAC$1,000
FASPAC FAREWAY STORES INC PAC$0
CUMMINS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CIPAC)-$1,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$1,000

Official PAC record
GOOGLE LLC NETPAC-$1,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$1,000

Official PAC record
THE TIMKEN COMPANY GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND-$1,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$1,000

Official PAC record
THE OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION PAC-$2,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$2,000

Official PAC record
COVINGTON AND BURLING LLP PAC-$2,500

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$2,500

Official PAC record
NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION RETAILPAC-$2,500

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$2,500

Official PAC record
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ARAPAC)-$5,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$5,000

Official PAC record
ARGENTUM'S SILVER PAC-$5,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$5,000

Official PAC record
GRIDIRON-PAC-$5,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$5,000

Official PAC record
HY-VEE INC EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE-$5,000

Richard J. Durbin · Cosponsor · -$5,000

Official PAC record

The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.

What happened after enactment?

Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.

Measured outcome: not established

Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.