
H.R. 6062 · 118th Congress · enacted
To restore the ability of the people of American Samoa to approve amendments to the territorial constitution based on majority rule in a democratic act of self-determination, as authorized pursuant to an Act of Congress delegating administration of Federal territorial law in the territory to the President, and to the Secretary of the Interior under Executive Order 10264, dated June 29, 1951, under which the Constitution of American Samoa was approved and may be amended without requirement for further congressional action, subject to the authority of Congress under the Territorial Clause in article IV, section 3, clause 2 of the United States Constitution.
Became Public Law No: 118-232.
Latest official action 2025-01-04 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
This act repeals the statute that prevents the people of American Samoa from approving amendments or modifications to the constitution of that territory. Under that statute, an act of Congress is required for such an amendment or modification.
Congressional Research Service · 2025-01-04
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
No matching lobbying report is imported yet. This is not evidence that no lobbying occurred.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
Sponsor
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen
House · AS · Republican
$18,100PAC receipts · 2025–2026
Cosponsor
James C. Moylan
House · GU · Republican
$35,000PAC receipts · 2025–2026
2 of 2 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
ELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS PAC$15,000
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen · Sponsor · $5,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $10,000
Official PAC recordHOUSE CONSERVATIVES FUND$6,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $6,000
Official PAC recordRAPTOR PAC$6,000
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen · Sponsor · $1,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordAMERICAN REVIVAL PAC$5,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordCONSERVATIVE OPPORTUNITY LEADERSHIP AND ENTERPRISE PAC$5,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordLOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$5,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordTHE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$5,000
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen · Sponsor · $5,000
Official PAC recordLAND OF OPPORTUNITY PAC$4,000
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen · Sponsor · $4,000
Official PAC recordMAGGIE'S LIST$3,100
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen · Sponsor · $3,100
Official PAC recordRVFPAC$2,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $2,000
Official PAC recordNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $1,000
Official PAC recordNATIONAL RURAL LETTER CARRIERS' ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $1,000
Official PAC recordBUILDING BRIDGES PAC$0
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · $0
Official PAC recordMR. SOUTHERN MISSOURIAN IN THE HOUSE PAC-$5,000
James C. Moylan · Cosponsor · -$5,000
Official PAC recordThe largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.
Measured outcome: not established
Enactment alone does not show whether a law improved its intended outcome. We need a dated evaluation, observed result or verified implementation record before claiming success or failure.