H.R. 6007 · 98th Congress · enacted
District of Columbia Retired Judge Service Act
Became Public Law No: 98-598.
Latest official action 1984-10-30 · Enacted
The bill, briefly
District of Columbia Retired Judge Service Act - Amends the District of Columbia Code to provide that a retired judge who has been recommended and appointed as a senior judge may be appointed by the chief judge to perform such judicial duties as such senior judge is assigned and willing and able to undertake. Sets forth the procedure for the designation of a retired judge as a senior judge by the District of Columbia Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure. Subjects a senior judge to reappointment every two years. Provides for retirement benefits for the executive officer of the District of Columbia Courts.
Congressional Research Service · 1984-07-24
Who reported lobbying on this bill?
Amount spent specifically on this bill: not disclosed
The reports below name this bill and disclose an organization’s overall lobbying expenses or a firm’s client income for the period. They can cover many bills and issues. These amounts are not payments to the bill or its politicians.
2,409 latest lobbying reports imported. Some source imports are still in progress.
Politicians behind the bill
Sponsors and cosponsors from the official source, limited to members currently in office. Campaign amounts are cycle-wide and are not payments for this bill.
1 of 1 source cosponsor records retrieved; only current officials and unwithdrawn sponsorships appear.
PAC donors to the listed sponsors
These are all-cycle contributions to the listed sponsors’ and cosponsors’ campaigns. FEC does not attribute them to this bill. A donation plus sponsorship does not establish why a politician acted.
The largest 40 donor totals appear here. Open each politician for their complete, paginated PAC donor list.
What happened after enactment?
Dated agency-reported implementation and uptake measures are shown with their scope. They do not by themselves establish causal success. If no evidence is listed, the outcome is not established.