StateCalifornia

SCR 7: Relative to permanent standard time.

Roger NielloIntroduced

SCR 7 status: Introduced — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 178, Statutes of 2026 (updated Aug 18, 2026).

1

What this bill does

Overall score

Score60/100 civic fit
RiskLow risk
ImpactLow impact 5/100

Bill summary

Official

This measure would proclaim that the Legislature acknowledges the health benefits of permanent standard time.

Key analysis

Constitutionality100%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion60%
2

Impact analysis

Environment

Mixed / Neutral
50%

Benefits

  • no identified direct environmental impact

Risks

  • no identified direct environmental impact

Economy

Mixed / Neutral
50%

Benefits

  • signals legislative intent favoring stability

Risks

  • no binding impact on labor or commerce regulations

Society

Positive Outlook
60%

Benefits

  • aligns with expert sleep medicine recommendations
  • advocates for public health through improved circadian rhythm stability

Risks

  • non-binding nature provides no immediate societal relief
3

How trustworthy & consequential it is

Source

LegiScan

Confidence

high

high

Analysis status

LegiScan full bill text

Warning

Resolution may create false expectations of imminent change to clock-setting practices

Limitation

Resolution is purely symbolic and lacks force of law

4

Where it stands

1

Introduced

Current

Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 178, Statutes of 2026.

2

Committee

Upcoming
3

Floor

Upcoming
4

Governor

Upcoming
5

Enacted

Upcoming
5

How it affects your district

Set your location

Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.

6

Take action

Contact your representatives

Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view

Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill

Stay updated on progress and changes.