StateCaliforniaIntroduced

SB1142: Abortion services.

Unknown Sponsor

SB 1142 status: Introduced — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 566, Statutes of 2022 (updated Sep 27, 2022).

01

What this bill does

Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.

Overall Score

78OUT OF 100
Score:78/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 65/100
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan20%
Public opinion60%

Bill summary

What changes

The bill mandates the creation of a centralized state website providing information on abortion rights, providers, and practical/financial support, while requiring the Department of Health Care Access and Information to evaluate and report on the Abortion Practical Support Fund.

Who is affected

Californians and out-of-state individuals seeking abortion care, state health departments, and organizations managing practical support services.

Requirements and enforcement

The CHHSA must establish a mobile-capable, multi-lingual, and accessible website by July 1, 2023. The department must report to the Legislature annually starting January 2025.

Costs and funding

Administrative and maintenance costs for the web portal and ongoing staff costs for the annual evaluation of the Abortion Practical Support Fund.

When it takes effect

Website deployment required by July 1, 2023; annual reporting begins January 2025.

Potential benefits

Increased transparency, reduced barriers to logistical support, standardized access to reproductive health info, and improved accountability via legislative oversight.

Risks and tradeoffs

Administrative costs, reliance on provider updates, and the ongoing budget dependency for the underlying grant programs.

What is still unknown

The exact scope and user traffic of the website and the total number of grant-funded logistical support outcomes that will be captured in the annual reports.

Read full text(opens in a new tab)
02

Impact analysis

✦ AI analysis

Modeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.

Environment

No direct effect

Neutral — no direct effect identified.

Benefits

  • No material direct effect identified

Risks

  • No material direct effect identified

Economy

Positive outlook

60%

Benefits

  • Increases information efficiency for patient care
  • Supports logistical organizations through grant evaluation
  • Streamlines search for financial and payment support

Risks

  • Requires ongoing administrative and maintenance costs
  • Administrative burden on state departments for reporting
  • Depends on future state budget appropriations

Society

Positive outlook

85%

Benefits

  • Improves equity for marginalized and unhoused populations
  • Provides multi-lingual access in major state languages
  • Combats medical misinformation through official channels

Risks

  • Does not resolve physical provider density issues
  • Digital-first approach may exclude those without internet
  • Depends on existing community organization capacity

Technology Industry

No direct effect

Neutral — no direct effect identified.

Benefits

  • No material direct effect identified

Risks

  • No material direct effect identified

Civic Accountability

Positive outlook

80%

Benefits

  • Requires annual evaluation reports to the Legislature
  • Mandates consultation with diverse subject matter experts
  • Includes a public feature to report outdated information

Risks

  • Accountability is limited to reporting, not service provision
  • Legislative review frequency may delay corrective action
  • Potential for agency discretion in resource selection

Public Health & Safety

Positive outlook

85%

Benefits

  • Facilitates timely access to medical health services
  • Connects patients to transportation and doula support
  • Standardizes medically accurate information dissemination

Risks

  • Cannot create new physical healthcare capacity
  • Misinformation persists despite government portal efforts
  • Physical distance remains a barrier for rural residents
03

How trustworthy & consequential it is

Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.

  • Source

    LegiScan

    Official bill text or data from LegiScan.

  • Confidence

    High

    Information is complete and verified.

  • Analysis basis

    LegiScan full bill text

    Source used for this bill's analysis.

Source note

Public access to the website remains contingent on state funding appropriations for maintenance.

Analysis scope

Source does not specify total fiscal impact for website maintenance

04

Where it stands

Official record
  1. IntroducedCurrent
  2. CommitteeUpcoming
  3. Chamber votesUpcoming
  4. Final agreementUpcoming
  5. GovernorUpcoming
  6. EnactedUpcoming
05

How it affects your district

✦ Personalized

Set your location

Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.

Your Representatives

Your representatives appear here once you add your location.

06

Take action

Contact your representatives

Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view

Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill

Stay updated on progress and changes.