Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
John Kissel
SB 483 status: Enacted — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR (updated Jun 4, 2026).

Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
Bill summary
The bill creates a new specific criminal offense under Connecticut law categorized as 'digital defrauding' to address online scams and deceptive digital conduct.
General public, digital platform users, potential bad actors, and law enforcement agencies responsible for investigating digital crime.
The source does not explicitly state the specific elements required to satisfy the charge, such as intent or specific monetary thresholds.
Not stated in the available source; however, implementation will involve law enforcement training and court system resource allocation.
The bill has been signed by the Governor as of June 4, 2026.
Provides a targeted criminal mechanism to address the rising frequency of online scams and provides greater legal protection for victims of digital financial harm.
The vague definitions provided in the summary suggest potential challenges regarding due process, legal clarity, and the risk of overly broad application.
The exact statutory language, penalty structure (e.g., prison time or fines), and interaction with existing state or federal anti-fraud laws remain unclear.
Modeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Positive outlook
Positive outlook
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Positive outlook
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
The lack of specific statutory language creates risk regarding potential for overly broad criminalization of digital activities.
!Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary abstract only; lack of full statutory text prevents detailed legal analysis.

Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.

Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.