Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified
Risks
- No material direct effect identified
StateDistrict of ColumbiaHearing Scheduled
PR 260581: Transfer of Jurisdiction Over a Portion of Reservation 360 and Reservation 639, S.O. 25-01393, Approval Resolution of 2026
Phil Mendelson
PR 260581 status: Hearing Scheduled — Public Hearing on PR26-0581 (updated Oct 2, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
55OUT OF 100
Score:55/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Low Impact 15/100
Constitutionality100%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The resolution approves the formal transfer of jurisdiction over specific public land parcels (Reservation 360 and Reservation 639) between government offices.
Who is affected
The relevant government agencies managing these specific parcels.
Requirements and enforcement
The resolution provides the necessary legal and legislative approval for the land management shift.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
The resolution was introduced in March 2026; a public hearing was scheduled for October 2026.
Potential benefits
Provides a clean legal transfer of administrative management for public lands.
Risks and tradeoffs
Minimal information on the underlying purpose or future management plan for these specific reservations.
What is still unknown
The specific intended use for the parcels after the transfer is not disclosed in the provided summary.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified
Risks
- No material direct effect identified
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified
Risks
- No material direct effect identified
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified
Risks
- No material direct effect identified
Civic Accountability
Mixed / Neutral
55%
Benefits
- Provides formal legislative oversight of land transfers
- Ensures public record of jurisdictional changes
- Utilizes standard legislative approval process
Risks
- Limited transparency regarding the specific intent
- Relies on standard legislative summary rather than full disclosure
- Potential for administrative complexity in oversight
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified
Risks
- No material direct effect identified
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Specific implications of the land transfer for future use or development are unknown.
Analysis scope
Source information is limited to an OpenStates abstract.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.