Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateFloridaVetoed
SB 382: Micromobility Devices
Transportation
SB 382 status: Vetoed — Vetoed by Governor (updated Jun 25, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
56OUT OF 100
Score:56/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 45/100
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
Micromobility Devices; Providing requirements for the operation of electric bicycles; prohibiting the operation of an electric bicycle above a certain speed under certain circumstances; creating the Micromobility Device Safety Task Force adjunct to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles; requiring the Florida Highway Patrol and each police department and sheriff’s office to maintain a certain list, beginning on a certain date, etc.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
45%
Benefits
- Standardized operational rules for businesses
- Predictable regulatory environment for vendors
- Potential reduction in accident-related costs
Risks
- Compliance costs for law enforcement agencies
- Administrative burden of new record-keeping mandates
- Regulatory friction for micromobility operators
Society
Mixed / Neutral
55%
Benefits
- Clearer expectations for road users
- Enhanced safety for pedestrians in shared spaces
- Formalized legislative approach to e-bike usage
Risks
- Potential for enforcement bias in communities
- New restrictions on personal mobility
- Compliance burden may limit low-income access
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Creates a Micromobility Device Safety Task Force
- Establishes mandatory law enforcement data collection
- Provides an explicit statutory framework for review
Risks
- Administrative overhead for municipal agencies
- Potential for inconsistent reporting across counties
- Governance reliance on task force output quality
Public Health & Safety
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- Mandated speed limits for electric bicycles
- Formal investigation of safety hazards
- Standardized operational safety protocols
Risks
- Enforcement difficulty in real-world scenarios
- Reliance on user compliance for safety efficacy
- Potential safety gaps if rules are complex
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Implementation success depends on law enforcement resource allocation.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary abstract; full legislative text not reviewed.
04
Where it stands
Official recordVetoed by Governor
- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeComplete
- Chamber votesComplete
- Final agreementComplete
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.