Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateIllinoisIntroduced
HB 5568: LOC GOV TORT IMMUNITY
Kevin Olickal
HB 5568 status: Introduced — Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Thaddeus Jones (updated Sep 15, 2026).
Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
74OUT OF 100
Score:74/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 45/100
Constitutionality95%
Bipartisan70%
Public opinion80%
Bill summary
What changes
HB 5568 amends the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act to explicitly exclude coroner and medical examiner offices from immunity regarding the handling, identification, disposal, or treatment of a deceased human.
Who is affected
Local government entities, coroners' offices, medical examiners' offices, and their respective public employees are directly affected. Families and the public are the beneficiaries of increased accountability.
Requirements and enforcement
Public employees and facilities must act with due care in all matters involving the handling of remains, as the bill permits litigation for negligence or wrongful acts.
Costs and funding
Not stated, but potential litigation costs, increased insurance premiums, and legal defense expenses are anticipated.
When it takes effect
Applies to causes of action arising on or after the effective date of the act.
Potential benefits
Increases accountability for public officials, improves the standard of care for deceased individuals, and provides families with legal recourse.
Risks and tradeoffs
Potential for increased fiscal burden on local governments, increased volume of litigation, and possible defensive management practices in public offices.
What is still unknown
The long-term impact on local government insurance premiums and the frequency of successful tort claims against these offices is unknown.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Critical outlook
40%
Benefits
- Establishes clearer legal standards for local government liability.
- Promotes better operational management through risk awareness.
- Reduces ambiguity in tort law claims for local entities.
Risks
- Increases fiscal risk for local taxpayers through potential litigation.
- May lead to higher insurance premiums for municipal offices.
- Imposes additional compliance costs for record-keeping and handling.
Society
Positive outlook
85%
Benefits
- Ensures families have legal recourse for the mistreatment of remains.
- Promotes greater dignity in the handling of deceased individuals.
- Upholds higher standards of ethical conduct in public service.
Risks
- May increase the emotional stress of litigation for involved parties.
- Potential for frivolous or unwarranted lawsuits against offices.
- Administrative focus may shift toward legal avoidance rather than service.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
90%
Benefits
- Removes broad immunity for specific acts of negligence.
- Increases transparency and responsibility for public offices.
- Aligns state law with contemporary expectations for accountability.
Risks
- Could lead to defensive administrative practices by staff.
- Requires local agencies to justify procedures more rigorously.
- May create tension between agency autonomy and public scrutiny.
Public Health & Safety
Positive outlook
80%
Benefits
- Encourages adherence to professional standards in autopsy and handling.
- Reduces the likelihood of systematic errors in identifying remains.
- Ensures consistent safety protocols for handling deceased persons.
Risks
- Potential for delays in procedures due to heightened scrutiny.
- Increased focus on litigation risks may strain facility morale.
- Agencies may face resource constraints impacting direct public health services.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Could create significant financial liability for smaller municipalities.
Analysis scope
No information provided on projected fiscal impact to counties.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.