Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateIllinoisIntroduced
HB 5809: STUDENT CARDIAC SAFETY ACT
Lindsey LaPointe
HB 5809 status: Introduced — Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Lindsey LaPointe (updated Aug 26, 2026).
Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
73OUT OF 100
Score:73/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 65/100
Constitutionality95%
Bipartisan70%
Public opinion80%
Bill summary
What changes
Creates the Student Cardiac Safety Act, which mandates cardiovascular prescreening for student-athletes beginning in 2027-2028 and for all K-12 students during annual well-child visits starting in 2028-2029.
Who is affected
Illinois students in grades K-12, their parents/guardians, pediatric healthcare providers, school districts, and the Department of Public Health.
Requirements and enforcement
Providers must follow evidence-based cardiovascular guidelines including personal/family history and physical examinations; districts must distribute educational materials.
Costs and funding
Potential costs for families for additional specialist referrals; potential state mandate reimbursement costs for local governments.
When it takes effect
Athletic screening begins 2027-2028; well-child screening begins 2028-2029.
Potential benefits
Improved early detection of heart conditions, better family education on sudden cardiac arrest, and data-driven oversight of pediatric health outcomes.
Risks and tradeoffs
Potential for increased healthcare system burden and the need for standardized provider training to avoid excessive false positives.
What is still unknown
The exact level of demand on the pediatric cardiology specialty sector and the final fiscal cost to the state.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
45%
Benefits
- Potential long-term reduction in healthcare costs for treatable cardiac conditions.
- Creates demand for ongoing training and education among pediatric healthcare professionals.
- Standardizes screening practices, potentially creating consistent billing practices.
Risks
- Increased compliance and administrative costs for pediatric practices.
- Potential for increased healthcare spending due to follow-up testing and specialist referrals.
- Resource burden on school districts to distribute educational materials annually.
Society
Positive outlook
80%
Benefits
- Increases early detection of potentially life-threatening congenital heart conditions.
- Promotes better long-term health outcomes for student-athletes and children.
- Educates parents and families on sudden cardiac arrest and heart failure risk factors.
Risks
- Potential for anxiety in families following a false-positive screening result.
- Risk of unequal access to follow-up cardiology care based on geographic location.
- Increased administrative burden on parents to complete additional screening requirements.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
75%
Benefits
- Requires the Department of Public Health to publish annual reports on screening and referral outcomes.
- Provides transparency regarding the effectiveness and adoption of prescreening guidelines.
- Includes mandatory public data sharing regarding false-positive rates and diagnostic performance.
Risks
- Data collection mechanisms depend heavily on provider compliance and reporting accuracy.
- Reporting requirements may expose administrative gaps if data collection proves burdensome.
- Reliance on internal departmental rules for specific screening execution limits statutory oversight.
Public Health & Safety
Positive outlook
90%
Benefits
- Directly enhances early detection of potentially fatal cardiac conditions in youth.
- Establishes evidence-based screening guidelines for school-aged populations.
- Increases physician training and awareness of pediatric cardiovascular risk factors.
Risks
- Reliance on referral efficiency; requires robust capacity in pediatric cardiology.
- Possibility of false positives leading to unnecessary diagnostic testing.
- Success hinges on the quality of initial screenings performed by varied providers.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Effectiveness depends entirely on the availability and accessibility of pediatric cardiology follow-up services.
Analysis scope
The bill is newly introduced and lacks committee testimony or amendments.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.