Environment
Critical outlook
Benefits
- None identified
Risks
- Increased fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions associated with higher driving speeds
COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
SF 378 status: Introduced — Fiscal note (updated Jun 2, 2026).

Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
Earlier scoring method. Reanalyze to use the sector calculation.
Bill summary
The bill shifts state-wide traffic speed regulations, insurance reporting requirements, and the statutory default speed limit, affecting all motor vehicle operators in the state.
Modeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Critical outlook
Positive outlook
Mixed / Neutral
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Increasing the default speed limit to 60 mph may increase the severity of traffic collisions
!Analysis scope
Long-term impact on traffic safety statistics is speculative

Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.

Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.