Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateKansasIn Committee
HB 2006: Providing membership in the KP&F retirement system for certain security officers of the department of corrections and allowing certain service credit purchases of previous KPERS security officer service for purposes of KP&F retirement benefits.
Pat Proctor
HB 2006 status: In Committee — Died in Committee (updated Apr 10, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
50OUT OF 100
Score:50/100 civic fit — mixed
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 40/100
Constitutionality80%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
This bill would allow certain prison security officers to join the "Police and Fire" (KP&F) retirement plan, which offers better benefits than their current one. It also lets them count their past years of work toward this new plan by paying to move that credit over. The bill is currently being discussed in the House.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
45%
Benefits
- Provides improved retirement benefits for corrections staff
- Improves recruitment incentives for correctional security roles
- Supports long-term financial planning for individual officers
Risks
- Potential to increase state unfunded pension liabilities
- Higher employer contribution costs for the state
- Complexity in actuarial calculations for service credit transfers
Society
Mixed / Neutral
55%
Benefits
- Enhances long-term financial security for correctional staff
- Recognizes the nature of corrections security work via retirement equity
- Potential improvement in employee morale and retention
Risks
- Potential for perceived inequity between different staff classifications
- Financial barrier to entry for officers unable to afford buy-back costs
- Implementation complexity for personnel offices
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Abstract-only input limits analysis of specific fiscal impact projections.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.