Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateKansasIn Committee
HB 2220: Permitting local authorities with jurisdiction over city residence districts to reduce the maximum speed limit from 30 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour without an engineering and traffic investigation.
Committee on Transportation
HB 2220 status: In Committee — Died in Senate Committee (updated Apr 10, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
65OUT OF 100
Score:65/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 40/100
Constitutionality95%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion80%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill would have authorized local authorities to reduce speed limits in residential districts from 30 mph to 25 mph without the currently required engineering or traffic investigations.
Who is affected
Cities, municipal traffic authorities, residents, and drivers within Kansas city limits.
Requirements and enforcement
The bill required local authorities to enact municipal ordinances to implement the change.
Costs and funding
Implied administrative costs associated with revising local ordinances and updating traffic signage.
When it takes effect
This bill died in the Senate committee during the 2025-2026 session.
Potential benefits
Potential for improved pedestrian and cyclist safety, increased local government responsiveness to community concerns, and lower administrative costs associated with professional engineering studies.
Risks and tradeoffs
Potential loss of data-driven safety assessments, risk of inconsistent speed regulations across municipal boundaries, and lack of professional engineering oversight for speed reduction decisions.
What is still unknown
The degree to which municipalities would have utilized this authority and the resulting impact on traffic flow or enforcement-related revenue.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
55%
Benefits
- Reduced administrative costs for municipalities by eliminating traffic studies
- Potentially safer streets supporting local neighborhood commercial foot traffic
- Streamlined local governance processes
Risks
- Increased potential for localized shipping and logistics delays
- Fiscal costs for cities to replace and update speed limit signage
- Administrative friction from varying speed regulations across adjacent city borders
Society
Positive outlook
70%
Benefits
- Enhanced pedestrian safety in residential neighborhoods
- Improved quality of life through quieter streets
- Reduced risks for children playing near residential roadways
Risks
- Potential for driver frustration due to reduced travel speeds
- Confusion resulting from inconsistent speed limits between neighboring jurisdictions
- Possibility of increased congestion on primary residential arteries
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Greater local control over residential safety standards
- Reduction of rigid statewide procedural requirements
- Direct legislative path for local officials to respond to community input
Risks
- Loss of professional engineering oversight in traffic safety decisions
- Potential for subjective or politically motivated speed limit changes
- Absence of data-driven requirements to justify regulatory adjustments
Public Health & Safety
Positive outlook
75%
Benefits
- Direct correlation between reduced speed and lower pedestrian accident severity
- Improved safety for cyclists sharing residential streets
- Reduced kinetic energy in vehicle-pedestrian collision scenarios
Risks
- Lack of engineering review to identify high-risk road design elements
- Risk that lower limits are implemented without necessary traffic calming infrastructure
- Potential for driver behavioral changes creating new safety hazards
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary and metadata only; full legislative text analysis not performed.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.