SB 242: Requiring that a political subdivision hold an open meeting to discuss a contingency fee contract for legal services before approving such contract and requiring the attorney general to approve such contracts.
SB 242 status: In Committee — Died in Committee (updated Apr 10, 2026).
OpenStates summary
What this bill does
Overall score


Bill summary
OfficialRequiring that a political subdivision hold an open meeting to discuss a contingency fee contract for legal services before approving such contract and requiring the attorney general to approve such contracts.. Currently in Senate.
Key analysis
Impact analysis
Environment
Benefits
- no direct impact on environmental policy
Risks
- no direct impact on environmental policy
Economy
Benefits
- standardizes oversight for public spending on legal services
Risks
- potential administrative delays in hiring outside counsel
Society
Benefits
- increases transparency through mandatory open meeting requirements
Risks
- may limit local control by requiring state-level attorney general review
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
lowlow
Analysis status
OpenStates summary
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis based solely on the OpenStates abstract
Where it stands
Introduced
CompleteCommittee
CurrentDied in Committee
Floor
UpcomingGovernor
UpcomingEnacted
UpcomingHow it affects your district
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.