Environment
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- No direct sector impact identified
Risks
- No direct sector impact identified
StateKansasIn Committee
SB 66: Substitute for SB 66 by Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics - Requiring annual filing of the statement of substantial interests by elected or appointed city or county officials, providing that officials of governmental subdivisions other than cities or counties file statements of substantial interests if any change in substantial interests occurred and requiring governmental officials with a substantial interest in a real estate development project to verbally disclose such interest prior to participating in any discussion, review or action on a proposed zoning change or permit.
Committee on Federal and State Affairs
SB 66 status: In Committee — Died in House Committee (updated Apr 10, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
85OUT OF 100
Score:85/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 60/100
Earlier scoring method. Reanalyze to use the sector calculation.
Constitutionality95%
Bipartisan75%
Public opinion90%
Bill summary
Substitute for SB 66 by Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics - Requiring annual filing of the statement of substantial interests by elected or appointed city or county officials, providing that officials of governmental subdivisions other than cities or counties file statements of substantial interests if any change in substantial interests occurred and requiring governmental officials with a substantial interest in a real estate development project to verbally disclose such interest prior to participating in any discussion, review or action on a proposed zoning change or permit.. Currently in Senate.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- Promotes fair competition in zoning and development
- Reduces potential for corruption in local government projects
Risks
- Minor increase in administrative compliance burden for officials
Society
Positive outlook
80%
Benefits
- Increases public trust in local government decision-making
- Improves transparency of potential conflicts of interest
Risks
- Reliance on official disclosure rather than independent verification
Technology Industry
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Civic Accountability
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Public Health & Safety
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Analysis based on abstract summary only; full text not reviewed
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.