Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Sam Zager
LD 107 status: Introduced — Died in Possession of the Senate when the Legislature adjourned Sine Die and was PLACED IN THE LEGISLATIVE FILES. (DEAD) (updated Apr 29, 2026).

Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
Bill summary
The bill would have mandated that health insurance companies cover costs for biomarker testing used to determine appropriate treatment paths.
Health insurance providers, medical diagnostic facilities, patients with illnesses requiring specialized diagnostics.
Insurance plans would be required to include these tests as covered benefits, likely shifting diagnostic costs from patients to insurance pools.
Direct costs to insurance carriers for testing; potential increases in insurance premiums for consumers.
The bill is no longer active and has died in the legislative files.
Patients would receive access to targeted treatments based on specific biological markers, potentially improving treatment efficacy.
Potential for increased insurance premiums and administrative delays due to pre-authorization processes for new mandated tests.
The specific scope of covered biomarkers and the thresholds for insurance company compliance were not clearly defined in the available summary.
Modeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Positive outlook
Positive outlook
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Positive outlook
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Mandates for insurance coverage can lead to increased consumer premiums.
!Analysis scope
Source quality is limited to a brief summary; full legislative text not reviewed.

Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.

Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.