Environment
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- potential for modernizing facilities to reduce ecological footprint
Risks
- risk of expansion impacting local habitats if funds support site development
StateMichiganIntroduced
HB 6231: Military affairs: other; Camp Grayling improvement fund; establish. Amends 1967 PA 150 (MCL 32.501 - 32.851) by adding secs. 388a, 388b, 388c, 388d, 388e & 388f.
Ron Robinson
HB 6231 status: Introduced — bill electronically reproduced 08/11/2026 (updated Aug 25, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
60OUT OF 100
Score:60/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 55/100
Earlier scoring method. Reanalyze to use the sector calculation.
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
Establishing a dedicated improvement fund for Camp Grayling impacts regional state military infrastructure, local economic activity, and environmental land use.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- direct state investment into regional military infrastructure
- potential job creation for local construction and maintenance
Risks
- fiscal burden on the state budget requires allocation decisions
Society
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- improved support for National Guard operational readiness
Risks
- no immediate direct impact on the general public population
Technology Industry
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Civic Accountability
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Public Health & Safety
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Fiscal oversight depends on the final bill language regarding fund governance.
Analysis scope
Analysis based solely on bill abstract; specific appropriation amounts and regulatory language unavailable.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.