Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateMichiganIntroduced
HB 6328: Traffic control: driver license; citizenship mark; require. Amends sec. 4 of 2008 PA 23 (MCL 28.304). TIE BAR WITH: HB 6329'26, HB 6330'26
Mike Hoadley
HB 6328 status: Introduced — bill electronically reproduced 09/16/2026 (updated Sep 17, 2026).
Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
48OUT OF 100
Score:48/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Low Impact 25/100
Constitutionality80%
Bipartisan40%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
This bill would require a special mark on driver’s licenses to show whether or not the person is a U.S. citizen. This bill is part of a "package deal," meaning it cannot pass unless two other related bills (HB 6329 and HB 6330) are also approved. It is currently being debated in the Michigan House of Representatives.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
45%
Benefits
- Minimal standardization of identification
- Clearer verification protocol for citizenship
- Potential minor revenue from replacement card requests
Risks
- Increased administrative processing costs for Secretary of State
- Potential for longer wait times at branch offices
- Cost of re-designing secure card printing protocols
Society
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Provides clear visual identity markers for citizens
- Satisfies constituent preference for national identification
- Reinforces existing status verification systems
Risks
- Potential for social friction over identity markers
- May create perceived tiering of identification holders
- Adds unnecessary documentation burden for individuals
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Increased administrative overhead at Secretary of State offices is likely.
Analysis scope
Does not account for the administrative costs not explicitly mentioned in the text.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.