Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateMichiganIntroduced
SB 1087: Businesses: limited liability companies; power of limited liability companies to spend in elections or ballot issues; revoke. Amends secs. 105, 210, 211 & 1008 of 1993 PA 23 (MCL 450.4105 et seq.) & adds sec. 210a. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1085'26, SB 1086'26
Sean McCann
SB 1087 status: Introduced — SENATE CO-SPONSOR(S) NAMED: VERONICA KLINEFELT (updated Sep 10, 2026).
Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
50OUT OF 100
Score:50/100 civic fit — mixed
Risk:High Risk
Impact:High Impact 75/100
Constitutionality30%
Bipartisan20%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill prohibits domestic and foreign LLCs from contributing money or anything of value to political candidates, parties, or ballot questions.
Who is affected
All domestic and foreign limited liability companies operating in Michigan.
Requirements and enforcement
LLCs must cease all political contributions; violations are subject to disgorgement and potential dissolution.
Costs and funding
Potential costs include legal fees for compliance, litigation over prohibited acts, and the catastrophic cost of business dissolution.
When it takes effect
Effective date dependent on the passage of tie-barred bills SB 1085 and SB 1086.
Potential benefits
Potentially reduces corporate influence in elections and limits 'dark money' or corporate-funded political advocacy.
Risks and tradeoffs
Significant constitutional concerns, severe dissolution penalties, and broad administrative discretion.
What is still unknown
The precise impact on existing business advocacy groups and the standard for 'anything of value' in legal proceedings.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Critical outlook
40%
Benefits
- Limits potential for corporate 'pay-to-play' political schemes.
- Prevents diversion of company assets into contentious political battles.
- May level the playing field for individual and non-corporate political donors.
Risks
- Imposes severe penalties, including dissolution, for prohibited political activity.
- Restricts the property rights of business entities to express political views.
- Creates significant compliance burdens for identifying prohibited 'value' expenditures.
Society
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Reduces the influence of large corporate entities in local and state elections.
- Potentially slows the escalation of political spending in ballot measure campaigns.
- Increases the visibility of individual community voices relative to corporate money.
Risks
- Concerns regarding the constitutionality of restricting speech-related spending.
- Risk of creating a 'chilling effect' on legitimate public issue advocacy.
- Potential for influence to shift to less transparent vehicles if corporate routes are closed.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Requires clear disgorgement of funds spent in violation of political finance rules.
- Grants explicit oversight authority to the attorney general for enforcement.
- Provides clear judicial review pathways for administrators' decisions.
Risks
- Grants high levels of discretionary enforcement power to the attorney general.
- Risk of political bias in the initiation of dissolution proceedings.
- Potential for enforcement ambiguity regarding what constitutes 'anything of value'.
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Section 210a(4) and (5) authorize the dissolution of a domestic LLC as a penalty for political expenditure, a severe and potentially irreversible impact on business operation.
Analysis scope
The bill is tie-barred to SB 1085 and SB 1086; without those texts, the comprehensive regulatory framework is incomplete.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.