Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateMississippiIn Committee
HR 154: Confederate Memorial Day; commemorate.
Stacey Hobgood-Wilkes
HR 154 status: In Committee — Died In Committee (updated Apr 15, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
30OUT OF 100
Score:30/100 civic fit
Risk:High Risk
Impact:Low Impact 10/100
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan20%
Public opinion30%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill proposed the creation of a state holiday commemorating Confederate Memorial Day.
Who is affected
The entire state population would be influenced by the symbolic adoption of the holiday.
Requirements and enforcement
The resolution would have established the commemorative day, though implementation details were not finalized prior to the bill's expiration.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
The bill was active during the 2026 session; it died in committee on April 15, 2026.
Potential benefits
Provides formal recognition and a platform for those interested in Southern heritage and historical remembrance.
Risks and tradeoffs
The primary concern is the potential for significant social backlash, polarization, and reputational damage to the state.
What is still unknown
The exact scope of the holiday's observance and whether it would have necessitated office closures or other operational shifts remains unknown.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Society
Critical outlook
30%
Benefits
- Honors specific historical perspectives for constituents
- Provides a formal venue for Southern heritage remembrance
- Standardizes a designated day for historical reflection
Risks
- Increases risk of social and cultural polarization
- Revives contentious debates over historical symbols
- Potential to alienate diverse demographic groups
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Resolution is inherently divisive and may impact social cohesion without addressing modern policy needs.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a brief abstract; full legislative text unavailable.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.