Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateMississippiIn Committee
SC 532: Urge United States Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell decision and restore marriage rights to states.
Kathy Chism
SC 532 status: In Committee — Died In Committee (updated Apr 15, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
20OUT OF 100
Score:20/100 civic fit
Risk:High Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 45/100
Constitutionality20%
Bipartisan10%
Public opinion30%
Bill summary
What changes
None; the bill is a concurrent resolution expressing a preference to the federal judiciary.
Who is affected
LGBTQ+ residents, same-sex married couples, and state legal systems.
Requirements and enforcement
None.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
The bill died in committee during the 2026 session.
Potential benefits
Provides a formal expression of states' rights advocacy.
Risks and tradeoffs
Directly threatens the legal standing of marriage equality established by the US Supreme Court.
What is still unknown
Legal ramifications in the state if the federal precedent were hypothetically overturned.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Society
Critical outlook
20%
Benefits
- Reasserts state sovereignty arguments in constitutional debates
- Reflects the formal legislative position of the sponsor
- Serves as a platform for public discussion on federal authority
Risks
- Challenges established marriage equality protections
- Risks destabilizing recognition of existing marriages
- Promotes the potential exclusion of LGBTQ+ citizens from equal rights
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Direct challenge to established civil rights precedent (Obergefell v. Hodges)
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary, not full legislative text
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.