Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateMissouriIntroduced
HB 3080: Modifies the historic preservation tax credit
Louis Riggs
HB 3080 status: Introduced — Delivered to Secretary of State (G) (updated Jul 13, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
50OUT OF 100
Score:50/100 civic fit — mixed
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 50/100
Constitutionality100%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill proposes modifications to the existing historic preservation tax credit program in Missouri.
Who is affected
Property owners of historic buildings, real estate developers, and the state treasury.
Requirements and enforcement
Not stated in the available source.
Costs and funding
Direct fiscal cost to the state depends on the scale and availability of the proposed tax credits.
When it takes effect
Introduced in the 2026 session; awaiting further legislative action.
Potential benefits
Potential for increased investment in building restoration and improved local neighborhood aesthetics.
Risks and tradeoffs
Fiscal stability of state tax credits and potential for inequitable access to tax benefits.
What is still unknown
Specific criteria for tax credit qualification and the total projected budgetary impact remain unknown.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Incentivizes investment in historic real estate
- Encourages local construction and renovation jobs
- Supports revitalization of older commercial areas
Risks
- Direct impact on state tax revenue collection
- Risk of inefficient use of taxpayer subsidies
- Potential for deadweight loss on non-essential projects
Society
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Maintains historic community character
- Promotes adaptive reuse of existing buildings
- Enhances neighborhood aesthetic and quality
Risks
- Risk of accelerating local gentrification
- Potential displacement of lower-income residents
- Focus on aesthetics over affordable housing needs
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary abstract only
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.