Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateMissouriIntroduced
HB 3279: Modifies provisions relating to the Missouri community service commission
Brenda Shields
HB 3279 status: Introduced — Delivered to Secretary of State (G) (updated Jul 13, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
63OUT OF 100
Score:63/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Low Impact 20/100
Constitutionality95%
Bipartisan70%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill modernizes administrative rules and operational procedures for the Missouri Community Service Commission.
Who is affected
Members and administrative personnel of the Missouri Community Service Commission and affiliated volunteer organizations.
Requirements and enforcement
Entities falling under the commission's purview must adhere to the updated administrative rules.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
Delivered to Secretary of State as of July 2026.
Potential benefits
Potential for increased efficiency and clearer governance for state-managed volunteer programs.
Risks and tradeoffs
The summary provides no details on the specific nature of the rule modifications, limiting external oversight of the changes.
What is still unknown
The precise impact on specific volunteer projects remains unknown without the full text.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Society
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- Aligns volunteer programs with current needs
- Streamlines community engagement structures
- Modernizes service-related organizational rules
Risks
- Potential for minor operational disruption
- Administrative friction during rule transition
- Possible misalignment of strategic focus
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Updated regulatory framework for commission
- Alignment with current legislative goals
- Formalized administrative oversight processes
Risks
- Lack of granular detail on rule shifts
- Potential for reduced local flexibility
- Reliance on internal administrative updates
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a brief summary only
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.