Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateMontanaIntroduced
SB 40: Revise supreme court public records laws by opening deliberations and files to the public
Greg Hertz
SB 40 status: Introduced — (S) Veto Override (updated Jun 27, 2025).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
65OUT OF 100
Score:65/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:High Impact 80/100
Constitutionality30%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion70%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill mandates that the Montana Supreme Court disclose its previously private case files and internal meeting notes to the public.
Who is affected
The Montana Supreme Court, its justices, and the public.
Requirements and enforcement
The Court would be required to open its private records and meeting notes for public inspection.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
Not stated in the available source.
Potential benefits
Increased transparency and public insight into the judicial decision-making process.
Risks and tradeoffs
Potential threats to judicial independence and the quality of private deliberation among justices.
What is still unknown
Legal safeguards for sensitive discovery material, potential for litigation regarding judicial privilege, and specific implementation deadlines.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- Increases judicial transparency regarding court decisions
- Allows public oversight of internal court deliberations
- Reduces potential for opaque or non-transparent court processes
Risks
- Potential interference with judicial independence
- Risk of inhibiting candid exchange of ideas between justices
- Exposure of internal legal strategies before final rulings
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Source material is limited to an OpenStates summary.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.