Environment
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- No direct impact on environmental policy.
Risks
- No direct impact on environmental policy.
StateNew HampshireHearing Scheduled
HB 1406: relative to health carrier recordkeeping requirements in utilization review, including specifications regarding the use of artificial intelligence.
Alicia Gregg
HB 1406 status: Hearing Scheduled — Public Hearing: 02/17/2026 01:45 pm GP 159 (updated Aug 5, 2026).
Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
75OUT OF 100
Score:75/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 65/100
Earlier scoring method. Reanalyze to use the sector calculation.
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan85%
Public opinion80%
Bill summary
The bill mandates operational changes to claims processing and utilization review for all health carriers operating within New Hampshire.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
55%
Benefits
- Protects provider billing integrity.
- Reduces arbitrary insurance denials based on automated flags.
Risks
- Increased compliance and recordkeeping costs for carriers.
- Potential for litigation regarding audit definitions.
Society
Positive outlook
80%
Benefits
- Ensures clinical decisions remain with healthcare providers.
- Enhances transparency in AI-driven utilization review.
Risks
- Possible reduction in efficiency of standard billing automated reviews.
Technology Industry
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Civic Accountability
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Public Health & Safety
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Potential for interpretive conflict between insurers' 'coding corrections' and providers' 'clinical judgment'.
Analysis scope
Terms like 'clinical judgment' lack granular legal definitions in the bill.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.