Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateNew HampshireIntroduced
HB 1547: relative to appeals from convictions in circuit court for certain offenses.
Erik Johnson
HB 1547 status: Introduced — Executive Session: 09/30/2026 10:00 am GP 230 (updated Sep 4, 2026).
Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
53OUT OF 100
Score:53/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 65/100
Constitutionality85%
Bipartisan70%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill requires defendants charged with specific misdemeanors (sexual assault, class A assault, and stalking) to elect between a circuit court trial (waiving jury rights) or an immediate appeal for a jury trial in superior court at the time of arraignment.
Who is affected
Defendants charged with specified sexual assault, class A assault, and stalking offenses; judicial staff; the New Hampshire superior and circuit courts.
Requirements and enforcement
Defendants must make a definitive election of rights early in the process. Courts must conduct a mandatory colloquy to ensure any jury trial waiver is knowing, voluntary, and intelligent.
Costs and funding
An estimated $617k–$843k annually by FY 2029 for additional staff and operational jury costs; no funding is provided in the bill.
When it takes effect
Takes effect January 1, 2027.
Potential benefits
Provides defendants with more deliberate, standardized access to their right to a jury trial and ensures procedural consistency across courts.
Risks and tradeoffs
Significant unfunded mandate on the judicial branch; potential for increased case resolution timeframes; higher administrative burden on the court system.
What is still unknown
The actual number of defendants who will elect jury trials versus circuit court trials is unpredictable, making the final fiscal impact difficult to peg exactly.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Critical outlook
40%
Benefits
- Aligns court processes with modern jury trial expectations
- Reduces litigation uncertainty for long-term caseload management
- Supports judicial staffing expansion for complex proceedings
Risks
- Unfunded fiscal impact of $500,000 to $1,000,000 annually
- Increases state-level personnel and operational costs
- Risk of court backlogs without sufficient funding
Society
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Enhances due process by clarifying jury trial access
- Prevents inadvertent waiver of constitutional rights
- Ensures defendants are informed through mandatory colloquies
Risks
- May lead to longer resolution times for criminal cases
- Potential for defendants to be pressured during early decision-making
- Complex procedural requirements for non-attorney defendants
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Standardizes procedural requirements across jurisdictions
- Enhances transparency of the waiver process
- Provides clearer oversight of jury trial waivers
Risks
- Adds administrative hurdles to standard judicial processing
- Potentially slows down case turnover rates
- Increases the burden of documentation for courts
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
The bill lacks a funding source to cover projected multi-million dollar annual increases in court costs.
Analysis scope
Fiscal impacts are estimates provided by the Judicial Branch.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.