Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateNew HampshireIn Committee
SB 498: relative to children's mental health services for persons 18 years of age and younger.
Regina Birdsell
SB 498 status: In Committee — Subcommittee Work Session: 10/07/2026 10:00 am GP 229 (updated Sep 17, 2026).
Source
LegiScan
Confidence
High
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
69OUT OF 100
Score:69/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 75/100
Constitutionality70%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion80%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill creates the 'New Hampshire Children's Behavioral Health Association,' a nonprofit entity tasked with collecting mandatory assessments from health insurance carriers, stop-loss carriers, and third-party administrators.
Who is affected
Insurance entities, self-funded health plans (including state and municipal pools), and youth under 19 with private health coverage.
Requirements and enforcement
Assessed entities must pay quarterly assessments; the Association must establish a plan of operation, report data to the Insurance Commissioner, and oversee funds for care management entities.
Costs and funding
An annual cost of over $2.5 million is estimated; the bill notes this will likely result in increased insurance premiums.
When it takes effect
Takes effect 60 days after passage; fiscal impacts expected to start in FY 2027.
Potential benefits
Provides dedicated, sustainable funding to improve access to intensive in-home and outpatient behavioral health services for children.
Risks and tradeoffs
Higher insurance premiums for employers and taxpayers, legal risks regarding the assessment mechanism, and potential implementation errors in the current legislative draft.
What is still unknown
Whether the Association can effectively manage assessments without disruption to insurance markets, and the potential for federal or state legal challenges to the structure of the mandate.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Critical outlook
40%
Benefits
- Provides stable, dedicated funding for childhood behavioral health services
- Encourages expansion of behavioral health provider capacity
- Supports preventive care, potentially reducing long-term public health costs
Risks
- Increases insurance premiums for families, employers, and state/local government
- Creates potential for retaliatory taxes from other states on NH insurers
- Increases compliance and administrative costs for third-party administrators
Society
Positive outlook
85%
Benefits
- Expands access to intensive in-home therapeutic interventions
- Introduces high-fidelity wraparound services for complex youth needs
- Integrates peer support specialists into the continuum of care
Risks
- Possible reduction in overall health benefit richness due to premium hikes
- Potential for disparities in service availability across rural or underserved regions
- Complexity of coordinating multiple systems may hinder immediate access
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
70%
Benefits
- Requires annual financial reporting to the insurance commissioner
- Mandates board-level oversight including ex-officio state official participation
- Establishes a transparent, formulaic process for annual assessment calculation
Risks
- Association board selection process may concentrate power in large carriers
- Limited transparency in internal board operational decisions
- Potential for ambiguity in regulatory vs. medical benefit categorization
Public Health & Safety
Positive outlook
80%
Benefits
- Directly addresses critical gaps in child mental health services
- Targets support for subacute needs to prevent hospitalization
- Provides multidisciplinary treatment options for behavioral health disorders
Risks
- Program implementation depends entirely on successful assessment collection
- Potential for fragmented care if coordination between entities fails
- Risk of excluding children who lack assessable insurance coverage
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
LegiScan
Official bill text or data from LegiScan.
Confidence
High
Information is complete and verified.
Analysis basis
LegiScan full bill text
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
The assessment will likely increase health insurance premiums for state employees and municipal plans
Analysis scope
Fiscal impacts are estimates based on 2025 legislative session data
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeCurrent
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.