StateNorth Carolina

HB 169: Haywood/Cherokee/Leland Occupancy Tax Modifications.

Unknown SponsorIntroduced

HB 169 status: Introduced — Withdrawn From Cal (updated Jul 2, 2026).

1

What this bill does

Overall score

Score60/100 civic fit
RiskLow risk
ImpactModerate impact 40/100

Bill summary

Official

Here is the plain English version: **The towns of Haywood, Cherokee, and Leland want to change the "hotel tax" that visitors pay when staying at local hotels or vacation rentals. Right now, state lawmakers are deciding whether to approve these changes.**

Key analysis

Constitutionality95%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
2

Impact analysis

Environment

Mixed / Neutral
50%

Benefits

  • no direct impact on environment

Risks

  • no direct impact on environment

Economy

Positive Outlook
60%

Benefits

  • increased municipal revenue for tourism development
  • potential funding for local public projects

Risks

  • potential reduction in visitor price competitiveness
  • increased tax burden on lodging operators and tourists

Society

Mixed / Neutral
50%

Benefits

  • potential infrastructure improvements for residents

Risks

  • limited transparency in how specific tax increases are utilized
3

How trustworthy & consequential it is

Source

OpenStates

Confidence

low

low

Analysis status

OpenStates summary

Warning

Local occupancy tax increases may reduce tourism volume

Limitation

Analysis based only on bill abstract

4

Where it stands

1

Introduced

Current

Withdrawn From Cal

2

Committee

Upcoming
3

Floor

Upcoming
4

Governor

Upcoming
5

Enacted

Upcoming
5

How it affects your district

Set your location

Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.

6

Take action

Contact your representatives

Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view

Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill

Stay updated on progress and changes.