Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateNorth CarolinaIntroduced
SJR 1090: APPT John Gajda Utility Commission.
Unknown Sponsor
SJR 1090 status: Introduced — Reptd Fav (updated Jul 2, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
50OUT OF 100
Score:50/100 civic fit — mixed
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Low Impact 15/100
Constitutionality100%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill confirms the appointment of John Gajda to the North Carolina Utilities Commission.
Who is affected
The North Carolina Utilities Commission and the nominee, John Gajda.
Requirements and enforcement
The Senate must vote to confirm the appointment as part of its oversight duties.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
Pending legislative confirmation as of July 2026.
Potential benefits
Ensures the Utilities Commission reaches full capacity through established legislative confirmation procedures.
Risks and tradeoffs
No policy or regulatory impact is established by this appointment resolution.
What is still unknown
The nominee's specific policy preferences or influence on future rate-setting and utility oversight remains unknown.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Formalizes legislative confirmation process
- Ensures executive-legislative collaboration
- Enables public review of nominee credentials
Risks
- Limits direct public input in selection
- Potential for partisan influence in confirmations
- Risk of agency regulatory capture
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Impact assessment is based on administrative appointment, not policy change.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary; full appointment criteria are not included.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.