Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateNorth DakotaIntroduced
HB 1229: AN ACT to create and enact a new subdivision to subsection 2 of section 39-06.1-06 and section 39-10-71.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to statutory fees for traffic offenses and a motor vehicle owner's responsibility regarding a driver who flees a peace officer; and to provide a penalty.
Austen Schauer
HB 1229 status: Introduced — Filed with Secretary Of State 05/02 (updated Jun 11, 2025).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
51OUT OF 100
Score:51/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 45/100
Constitutionality70%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
HB 1229 creates new statutory fees for traffic offenses and imposes legal responsibility on motor vehicle owners for incidents where a driver flees a peace officer.
Who is affected
All registered motor vehicle owners in North Dakota, particularly those who allow others to operate their vehicles.
Requirements and enforcement
Vehicle owners may be held liable for traffic offenses or fleeing incidents committed by operators of their vehicles.
Costs and funding
New statutory fees for traffic offenses and potential penalties associated with driver flight incidents.
When it takes effect
The bill was filed with the Secretary of State on May 2, 2025.
Potential benefits
Potential increased deterrence of dangerous fleeing incidents and improved road safety for officers and the public.
Risks and tradeoffs
Vicarious liability creates risk for vehicle owners; potential for disproportionate penalties; lack of clear definitions regarding owner responsibility limits.
What is still unknown
The specific burden of proof required to shift liability from the owner back to the driver remains unclear.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
45%
Benefits
- Increases state revenue through additional traffic fees
- Establishes a more structured fee schedule
- Standardizes financial penalties for traffic violations
Risks
- Adds financial burden to registered vehicle owners
- Potential for regressive economic impact on lower-income drivers
- Increases costs associated with vehicle ownership
Society
Critical outlook
40%
Benefits
- Promotes public compliance with traffic laws
- Discourages dangerous fleeing incidents
- Reinforces individual accountability for vehicle usage
Risks
- Creates vicarious liability for actions taken by others
- Increases punitive exposure for vehicle owners
- Potential for disparate impact on families or households
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Defines clear statutory responsibility for owners
- Provides legislative framework for specific offenses
- Standardizes penalties to limit judicial discretion
Risks
- Risk of overbroad enforcement discretion for police
- Potential lack of clarity in 'owner responsibility' thresholds
- Insufficient oversight mechanisms for fine collection
Public Health & Safety
Positive outlook
70%
Benefits
- Discourages dangerous high-speed fleeing behaviors
- Enhances safety for peace officers during traffic stops
- Clarifies severe consequences for illegal flight
Risks
- Fleeing incidents remain inherently dangerous regardless of fines
- Potential for increased confrontation during initial stops
- Punitive measures do not address root cause behaviors
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
The bill introduces vicarious liability, which may penalize owners for actions taken by others without their direct knowledge.
Analysis scope
Analysis is based on a summary abstract rather than full legislative text.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.